Evidence record

Suchy Y et al. Pitfalls in research on ecological validity of novel executive function tests: A systematic review and a call to action. Psychological Assessment. 2024;36(4):243-261.

A governed Evidence source projected for the exact ND Oracle claims it bears on.

A source is not a conclusion. Read the exact claim, role, context, limitations and uncertainty together. This record is not a recommendation, diagnosis, legal decision or quality score.

Source record

Source kind: peer reviewed
Evidence model: Accepted legacy v0.1 embedded source
Accessed: 2026-08-12
Oracle last reviewed: 2026-08-12

Open source

Claims this source bears on

A cognitive task's resemblance to an everyday activity does not by itself show that its score predicts real-world functioning; ecological validity requires direct evidence linking test performance to real-world outcomes.

Claim reference: executive-function#executive-function-claim-ecology · Confidence: high · Evidence role: Legacy source route — no v0.2 contribution role inferred

Evidence limitations

None recorded.

Claim uncertainty

How well do specific executive-function measures predict person-defined functioning in real environments?

Funding and conflicts

None recorded.

Evidence projection provenance

Batch B original-five evidence review authorised by the owner on 2026-08-12 and promoted from preserved candidate blob f4a4e41e100303e40270fcb60e9ed7502e486920; candidate history remains preserved.

Public projection ID: legacy-executive-function-executive-function-source-suchy-2024